<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for return to pearse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.returntopearse.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.returntopearse.com</link>
	<description>sometimes a photoblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 20:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Broke. by Rojo</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/broke/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Rojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 11:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/?p=112#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Fix your blog!!! miss your posts...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fix your blog!!! miss your posts&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Editing Photos. Eating Goldbears. by neil</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/editing-photos-eating-goldbears/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 11:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/editing-photos-eating-goldbears/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Very much David.
Very much indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very much David.<br />
Very much indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Editing Photos. Eating Goldbears. by delta214</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/editing-photos-eating-goldbears/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>delta214</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 22:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/editing-photos-eating-goldbears/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>How dyou like them apples?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How dyou like them apples?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lupe Fiasco at Tripod by Nathalie</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 21:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-201</guid>
		<description>Hmmm. I don't want to come across all psycho keen, seeing as I just commented on your awesome FLA shots, but these too are brilliant!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm. I don&#8217;t want to come across all psycho keen, seeing as I just commented on your awesome FLA shots, but these too are brilliant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lupe Fiasco at Tripod by Nay</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Nay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 14:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I have one of those sigmas as well, I learned to shoot gig photos on it and really love the wide angle it gives, plus the zoom, in well-lite shows it was always a nifty go-between the primes and telescopics. however since picking up a Nikkor prime (1.4) I can't bear to use the old 2.8 because the grain is dreadful if you're on 1600 ISO in a small venue like the Boom Boom Room. That's why I was so shocked to see such great quality in these shots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have one of those sigmas as well, I learned to shoot gig photos on it and really love the wide angle it gives, plus the zoom, in well-lite shows it was always a nifty go-between the primes and telescopics. however since picking up a Nikkor prime (1.4) I can&#8217;t bear to use the old 2.8 because the grain is dreadful if you&#8217;re on 1600 ISO in a small venue like the Boom Boom Room. That&#8217;s why I was so shocked to see such great quality in these shots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lupe Fiasco at Tripod by neil</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-199</guid>
		<description>Yeah it's the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8, think the nice bright lighting of a big venue helps.

Had a hard time deciding which lens I'd use (3 songs, so little chance to swap) but he was moving around the stage so much I wanted a zoom rather than a prime so i could follow him without moving around too much.

There was a slight incident involving Fight Like Apes in UCD that resulted in possible breaking of the lens, but I'm not sure. As far as I can tell, it's just manual focusing is broken and auto is OK, so I think I can get away with using it for another while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it&#8217;s the Sigma 24-70 f/2.8, think the nice bright lighting of a big venue helps.</p>
<p>Had a hard time deciding which lens I&#8217;d use (3 songs, so little chance to swap) but he was moving around the stage so much I wanted a zoom rather than a prime so i could follow him without moving around too much.</p>
<p>There was a slight incident involving Fight Like Apes in UCD that resulted in possible breaking of the lens, but I&#8217;m not sure. As far as I can tell, it&#8217;s just manual focusing is broken and auto is OK, so I think I can get away with using it for another while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lupe Fiasco at Tripod by Nay</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Nay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Bloody brilliant quality for 2.8!! Don't tell me it's the wide-angle Sigma (I noticed you use one)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloody brilliant quality for 2.8!! Don&#8217;t tell me it&#8217;s the wide-angle Sigma (I noticed you use one)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lupe Fiasco at Tripod by neil</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>Thanks Nay

These were all taken at f/2.8.
You're right about rappers being photogenic, and it helps when there's no mic stands or other band members in the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Nay</p>
<p>These were all taken at f/2.8.<br />
You&#8217;re right about rappers being photogenic, and it helps when there&#8217;s no mic stands or other band members in the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lupe Fiasco at Tripod by Nay</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Nay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 15:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/lupe-fiasco-at-tripod/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Hey, these are great shots! The focus is quite sharp, was your lens a high f-stop? I love rappers' originality for pics, some come out so photogenic!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, these are great shots! The focus is quite sharp, was your lens a high f-stop? I love rappers&#8217; originality for pics, some come out so photogenic!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on NSMA by Shane</title>
		<link>http://www.returntopearse.com/nsma/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Shane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 16:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.returntopearse.com/nsma/#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Right on cue, here's a Jerome's Law comment.

The pics are indeed class and any others you could send on to us would be great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on cue, here&#8217;s a Jerome&#8217;s Law comment.</p>
<p>The pics are indeed class and any others you could send on to us would be great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
